Showing posts with label Ficci. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ficci. Show all posts

Monday, August 26, 2019

FICCI-ELICIT Action Plan for end-of-life care and decision-making for patients



Dr KK Aggarwal

Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) and End of Life Care in India Taskforce (ELICIT) have also released an information guide to improve and facilitate execution of end-of-life decisions for patients and their families, in addition to their guide for doctors and hospital administrators

Here are excerpts from the “Action Plan for end-of-life care and decision-making” for patients.

“Plan in Advance: Self-awareness is the beginning of any journey. Think about how and where you would like to die.

Do not be afraid to bring up the subject of death if you feel it is relevant to you: Senior citizens or those with serious or life limiting illness should proactively assume the responsibility of discussing their future medical care preferences with family and loved ones and their treating doctors.

Ask your treating doctor and medical team about various options available to you and the advantages and disadvantages associated with each of them: It is important to remember that you cannot be forced to accept life-sustaining treatment against your wishes. Your treating doctor and medical team have an ethical and legal obligation to respect your wishes if you refuse any offered treatment, after understanding the consequences of such refusal.

To prepare for situations when you may not be in a position to express your wishes, make an Advance Medical Directive (AMD): An Advance Medical Directive has two components:

1.     The Living Will, which expresses your wishes for care clearly so that doctors can understand and follow them
2.     The appointment of a healthcare proxy, through a power-of-attorney, who can speak for you when you are no longer capable of doing so. Your healthcare proxy could be a member of your family or a friend, but should not be your treating doctor. This saves the family the agony of taking decisions on your behalf without any guidance or without knowing your wishes

Discuss your directive with your family and/or healthcare proxy and make sure that they accept the appointment. It is advisable to make the directive in the presence of two witnesses, who will attest to the fact that you have made the directive with a sound mind. This directive can be revoked verbally/in writing. Although at present the Supreme Court has mandated a rather cumbersome process for using these directives, rationalization of the process is being advocated for.

Take charge and accept death as part of life: If a serious or terminal illness is diagnosed, prepare to take charge of the last days of your life. Use all sources medical, social, psychological and spiritual, to live well till the end. Do not resist the natural course of death. Discuss your needs and expectations now and in the future with family members, doctors and trained counsellors. If you realize that you would rather not know or engage with such matters, appoint a trusted surrogate decision maker.”

(Source: FICCI-ELICIT Improving end-of-life care & decision-making information guide to facilitate execution of end-of-life decisions - for patients and their families)

See related link:

FICCI-ELICIT guide to improving end-of-life care & decision-making



Dr KK Aggarwal
Padma Shri Awardee
President Elect Confederation of Medical Associations in Asia and Oceania (CMAAO)
Group Editor-in-Chief IJCP Publications
President Heart Care Foundation of India
Past National President IMA

Friday, August 23, 2019

FICCI-ELICIT guide to improving end-of-life care & decision-making



Dr KK Aggarwal

Advance Medical Directives (AMD) are now legal in India following the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the matter of “Common Cause versus Union of India, 2018 (5) SCC 1”. The treating doctor who in good faith abides by an advance directive will not be held liable under criminal law.

The Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) and End of Life Care in India Taskforce (ELICIT) have come together to release an information guide to improve and facilitate execution of end-of-life decisions for doctors and hospital administrators.

ELICIT is a joint initiative of the Indian Academy of Neurology, Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) and Indian Association of Palliative Care (IAPC) formed in 2015.

Here are excerpts from the “Action Plan for end-of-life care and decision-making”.

·         “Respect a competent patient's decision: When the patient who is competent refuses treatment this should be honored. Respecting the patient's decision is required by the law. This decision should be respected even if the patient's family members express a different opinion regarding Foregoing of Life Support (FLS).

·         Opt for shared decision making, if overriding an AMD is in the patient's best interest: If the patient is incompetent but has a valid AMD, this must be honored as far as possible. If there are valid grounds to override the same in the best interests of the patient, a consensus through shared-decision making should be arrived at, between caregivers and surrogates, which should be duly documented.

·         Base the decision on wishes of the patient as well as the prognosis, when no AMD is available: If there is no AMD available, decisions between care givers and surrogates must be based on the 'values and wishes' of the patient as known to the family as well as the prognosis and best interests of the patient as judged by the treating doctors. Only under exceptional circumstances, such as when a person is in a persistent vegetative state, can the Court-recommended procedure be implemented. For example, in a case of terminal cancer with imminent death, decision not to put the patient on a ventilator needs to be taken within hours or few days. In the common scenario, the FLS decisions must be based on refusal of consent for either initiation or continuation of life sustaining treatment in such cases. All decisions must also be duly documented to ensure transparency.

·         Certify and document Brain Death in accordance to the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994: Brain death should be certified and documented in the manner laid down in the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 irrespective of whether there is consent for organ donation or not. This is in conformity with internationally accepted definitions of death. This position in Law was further reiterated in the Aruna Shanbaug judgement. When brain death has been so certified, the patient can be disconnected from life support unilaterally after informing and counselling the family.”

The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 has defined a "deceased person" as a person in whom permanent disappearance of all evidence of life occurs, by reason of brain-stem death or in a cardiopulmonary sense, at any time after live birth has taken place

(Source: FICCI-ELICIT information guide to facilitate execution of end-of-life decisions - for Doctors and Hospital Administrators)


Dr KK Aggarwal
Padma Shri Awardee
President Elect Confederation of Medical Associations in Asia and Oceania (CMAAO)
Group Editor-in-Chief IJCP Publications
President Heart Care Foundation of India
Past National President IMA

Saturday, March 2, 2019

Over 30 organisations, industry bodies oppose proposal to ban vape content




PTI: More than 30 organisations and industry bodies, including Ficci, CII and the Cellular Operators Association of India, have written to the Electronics and IT Ministry (MeitY), urging it not to ban online content related to the Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).

Other major organisations supporting this include Asia Internet Coalition, Broadband India Forum, Internet Freedom Foundation, Data Security Council of India, Heart Care Foundation of India, and The Centre for Internet and Society.

The draft amendment to the intermediary guidelines rules proposes new regulations for intermediaries (digital platforms), including a clause on banning online content that promotes ENDS.
These entities, in a statement on Thursday, said citizens have the right to access information on safer alternatives to smoking. The submissions form part of the 609-page document.

"...(These) organisations have opposed the ban on content related to ENDS citing overstepping of IT ministry's jurisdiction, violation of consumer rights, no legal backing for the action and use of vague terminology that can lead to misinterpretation and overregulation," it added.

Vape refers to electronic cigarettes or similar devices that simulate the experience of smoking a cigarette.

The statement quoted Association of Vapers India Director Samrat Chowdhery as saying that it is encouraging that many organisations concerned with public health have sought removal of the proposed ban on ENDS content.

"India is reeling under a tobacco epidemic which causes nearly a million deaths a year. We stated in our submission that denying people access to information on safer alternatives will, therefore, be highly detrimental and in violation of Article 21 of our constitution," he added.

The Data Security Council of India (DSCI), a Nasscom initiative, said the terms and expressions used are ambiguous and may be deemed unconstitutional.

Amnesty India said it "is concerned that the rules use vague and overly broad terms to identify expression that can be restricted, going well beyond both Indian and international human rights standards on freedom of expression".

Dr KK Aggarwal
Padma Shri Awardee
President Elect Confederation of Medical Associations in Asia and Oceania   (CMAAO)
Group Editor-in-Chief IJCP Publications
President Heart Care Foundation of India
Past National President IMA