Showing posts with label Madras High Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Madras High Court. Show all posts

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Madras High Court issued guidelines for curbing sexual harassment in educational institutions


Dr KK Aggarwal & Advocate Ira Gupta

In an unexpected turn of events, a plea made against the transfer of a government school teacher has prompted the Madras High Court to direct the creation of a toll-free number to report instances of sexual harassment and indiscipline by teachers in state educational institutions.

Further, Justice SM Subramaniam has also ordered that government school teachers be warned by the state of disciplinary action if they conduct private tuitions beyond school hours, whether on a working day or holidays. The judge opined,

“Conducting Tuition classes after the School hours are the acts, which all are unbecoming of a public servant and furthermore, they are taking such Tuitions / Tutorial classes for monetary benefits. Thus, all those activities of the Teachers across the State are to be monitored and suitable actions are to be initiated. “

The observation was made in the backdrop of a bar on private employment under Rule 8 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules. In view of the same, the Court remarked,

“It is most unfortunate to state that these Teachers are soliciting the students to join the Tuition classes at their home or in the place organized by such Teachers. The students, after School hours, are sometimes forced to attend the Tuition classes. Taking of Tuition after School hours is also a misconduct. Public servant must show devotion to his duty…”

Terming the same as a form of indiscipline, the Court has suggested that such actions also be reported using the toll-free number that the government has been directed to set up. This number may also be used to make complaints regarding sexual harassment and other issues being faced within schools.  As noted in the order,

This Court, with great pain, records that growing instances of Sexual Harassment in Schools, Colleges and Universities are causing greatest concern both to the parents as well as to the society at large… The activities in the Schools are not only to be monitored by the educational authorities, but also, to be monitored by the parents and all other interested persons.

If any such incidences are noticed, then the parents, public, students must be in a position to immediately register a complaint in a Toll Free Telephone Number, which is to be provided by the Education Department of the State. In the event of receiving any such complaint from any person, the authorities must immediately conduct an enquiry and find out the truth regarding the complaint. Such a system requires an immediate implementation in order to create awareness in the minds of the students, parents and public at large.”

While observing that teaching is a noble public service, the Court also proceeded to castigate the inclination of teachers to engage in public agitations. Justice Subramaniam opined that such activities should be viewed seriously by the authorities.

These Teachers sometimes conducting agitations, Dharnas during the eve of public examinations in order to threaten the “State Government” as well as the public. Such activities of the Teachers are to be viewed seriously and constant actions in this regard are to be taken by the competent authorities. There cannot be any leniency or misplaced sympathy in respect of such activities, causing great damage to the society at large as well as affecting the developments of our great Nation through the young minds.

In view of the above observations, the Court proceeded to issue the following directions to the state,

·         Provide Toll Free Telephone Numbers within eight weeks to enable students, parents, interested persons, and public, in general, to register complaints regarding the indiscipline, illegal activities, irregularities, Sexual Harassment etc., and also in respect of the conduct of private trade business or Tuitions or Tutorial classes by the Teachers or authorities of the Education Department.
·         Display the said Toll-Free Telephone Numbers and the details of the authorities in the Notice Board of all the Schools, Educational institutions across the State of Tamil Nadu prominently for public awareness
·         Complaints registered through the Toll-Free Telephone Numbers should be attended to immediately and response action should be initiated within 24 hours from the time of registering the complaint.
·         Issue circulars to all Educational Institutions, Schools etc. stating that the Teachers and the public servants should not be involved in the conduct of private tuition classes or private trade, highlighting that engagement in such activity already constitutes misconduct under the Tamil Nadu Governments Conduct Rules.

The main petition was dismissed after the Court took note that the transfer being challenged would not affect the service conditions or the normal life of the petitioner. The petitioner, in this case, was transferred to a school that was two kilometres away, on the request of the fourth respondent in the case, another school employee. On suspecting that the “frivolous’ petition may have been filed to politicise the issue, as an offshoot of personal animosity, the Court also directed the petitioner and the fourth respondent to plant 50 saplings within their school campus within two weeks.

In doing so, the Court also reiterated that transfer orders cannot be challenged in a routine manner, unless there is a statutory violation, or if there is ill intent or arbitrariness involved. As noted in the order,

Judicial review against the order of transfer is certainly limited. An order of transfer can be challenged, if the same is issued by an incompetent authority, having no jurisdiction or an allegation of mala fides are raised or if the same is in violation of the statutory rules in force. Even, in case of raising an allegation of mala fides, the authority against whom such an allegation is raised, to be impleaded as a party respondent in the writ proceedings in his personal capacity. In the absence of any one of these legal grounds, no writ petition can be entertained against an order of transfer in a routine manner.”

(Source: BarandBench)

Dr KK Aggarwal
Padma Shri Awardee
President Elect Confederation of Medical Associations in Asia and Oceania   (CMAAO)
Group Editor-in-Chief IJCP Publications
President Heart Care Foundation of India
Past National President IMA


Thursday, December 20, 2018

Madras High Court bans online sale of medicine till central government notifies regulatory rules



Dr KK Aggarwal & Advocate Ira Gupta

In the matter titled as “The Tamil Nadu Chemists and Druggists Association versus Union of India & Others” the Hon’ble Madras High Court has banned the online sale of drugs and cosmetics till the Central Government notified the proposed Drugs and Cosmetics Amendment Rules, 2018. The Hon’ble High Court has also directed the Central Government to notify the proposed Drugs and Cosmetics Amendment Rules, 2018 which deals with regulations and rules w.r.t. online sale of drugs and cosmetics, by 31stJanuary, 2019 and not later than that.

The judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras is reproduced hereunder:

34. In this case also, though there is a statute, the regulatory rules are yet to be notified, in the wake of advancement of technology. Unless the legislation keeps pace with the technology, the commerce based on technology has to lag behind.

35. While the draft rules are published in the Gazette, they are yet to be notified. Once it is notified, there is bound to be disagreement between law makers, drug companies, on-line traders and finally the consumers. In the absence of any Central or State Government legislation or rules, on-line sale of prescription drugs could hardly be curbed.

36. The Central Government had already been given a longer rope by the order of the Division Bench, which was passed as early as on 20.12.2016. Though around two years have passed from the date of the said judgment, the rules are still at the draft stage.

37. For the reasons set hitherto, it becomes necessary for the Central Government to notify the rules at the earliest in the interest of public and the on-line drug trade. Accordingly, respondents 1 and 3 are directed to notify the proposed Drugs and Cosmetics Amendment Rules, 2018 in the Gazette at the earliest, however, not later than 31.01.2019. Thereafter, the concerned stakeholders, namely, persons doing trade in on-line pharmacy have to obtain their licences in the manner prescribed in the rules to be notified, within a period of two months from the date of such notification.

38. As the draft rules are framed by the Central Government, after deliberations including the stakeholders, till the aforesaid rules are notified, the on-line traders are bound not to proceed with their on-line business in drugs and cosmetics."

Dr KK Aggarwal
Padma Shri Awardee
President Elect Confederation of Medical Associations in Asia and Oceania   (CMAAO)
Group Editor-in-Chief IJCP Publications
President Heart Care Foundation of India
Immediate Past National President IMA