Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

153 CMAAO CORONA FACTS and MYTH BUSTER ICMR Vaccine


153 CMAAO CORONA FACTS and MYTH BUSTER  ICMR Vaccine

Dr K Aggarwal
President CMAAO
With inputs from Dr Monica Vasudev
975: Round Table Expert Zoom Meeting on “Covid-19 vaccine update

17th July, 2020, 11am-12pm

Participants

Dr KK Aggarwal
Dr Ashok Gupta
Dr AK Agarwal
Dr Ashok Gupta
Dr Suneela Garg
Dr DR Rai
Dr Narottam Puri
Dr JA Jayalal
Dr Jayakrishnan AV
Dr Alex Thomas
Dr Atul M Kochhar
Dr Glory Alexander
Ms Meenakshi Datta Ghosh
Mrs Upasana Arora
Dr K Kalra
Ms Ira Gupta
Dr S Sharma

Faculty

Dr NK Ganguly
Former Director-General, ICMR

Key points from the discussion

  • A herd immunity of 60-70% is required to stop the spread of infection in the community; however, development of herd immunity will take time. This can be achieved with vaccine.
  • A vaccine which gives 40% protection may not be ideal; if it gives 70% protection, it will stop transmission.
  • In India, phase 1 and 2 trials only; phase 3 yet to be done. Nineteen of the vaccines around the world have completed phase 1 or are in/completed phase 2 and have entered phase 3. Some international vaccines have entered phase 3, so may come out with a vaccine earlier than us.
  • US FDA has brought out separate guidelines for animal toxicology studies for Covid vaccine.
  • Different platforms are being used to make the vaccine safe. Very limited amount of the viral protein (such as preformed spike protein, receptor binding domain [RBD]) is used to make it as safe as possible. The whole cell vaccine (killed or attenuated) may cause problems as they contain all viral antigens, which might produce immune responses.
  • Immune responses in humans differ. This is why three age groups will receive the vaccine: 18-55, 55-70, ≥70. Different concentrations are taken and multiple injections are needed – one to prime and the second to boost.
  • Will the vaccine work will depend on whether neutralizing antibodies are formed. They are checked in two formats: live virus and ghost cells. Moderna vaccine (synthetic vaccine) was able to get neutralizing antibodies in 8 of its subjects and it also passed safety (there will be some swelling, redness at the site, fever, nausea but no serious adverse effects like cytokine storm, autoimmune reaction). Moderna has finished phase 2, but they have not published.
  • Pfizer has taken four different constructs of mRNA vaccine with BioNTech. Two of them have completed phase 2.
  • In India, Gennova Pharmaceuticals is developing mRNA vaccine and have almost finished preclinical studies. Their results in mice are good and in monkey challenge are excellent. They have completed studies on plasma and did not find any autoimmune reaction, cytokine storm or any deleterious immune reaction.
  • Till phase 3 is done, there is no certainty that the vaccine will succeed. People may react differently according to the endemicity like the Rota virus vaccine.
  • No mRNA vaccine is in the market yet. Moderna and Pfizer vaccines have gone into human trials; Gennova are almost completing the animal and preclinical studies.
  • Spike protein vaccine (Astrazeneca and Oxford vaccine). They have given license to several companies. In India, license has been given to Serum Institute of India. If the vaccine succeeds in phase 2, they will start manufacturing and release the vaccine as an emergency vaccine if phase 3 is successful.
  • Novavax vaccine: Phase 2 is completed.  It is entering phase 3 trials in Australia and Brazil. Matrigel adjuvant is used. It is funded by BARDA. Novavax has a joint venture with Cadila Pharma called CLP Biologicals in Ahmedabad.
  • There is a global list of 19 prospective companies; no Indian company features on this list.
  • The Johnson & Johnson vaccine is using Adeno-26 platform and pre-fusion spike protein, which has been successfully used by them in Ebola vaccine (RNA vaccine) and RSV vaccine. J&J has so far no agreement with any Indian company, but they are talking to Aurobindo, which has bought a small vaccine company from Pfizer in the US. It is using a vesicular stomatitis virus platform for vaccine development, which is likely to be manufactured in their unit in Hyderabad.
  • Bharat Biotech vaccine:  It is a whole cell killed vaccine. There are few challenges: If it has an alum adjuvant, then it might produce immune response. Since there are no human trials yet, we do not know how it will behave.
  • Sinovac inactivated whole virus vaccine from China might be the first vaccine available. It is alum adjuvanted and is already in human trials. Formaldehyde is used to inactivate the virus.
  • Most vaccine products are being tested in multiple countries.
  • In India, the regulatory pathway to monkey studies is very long. For animal studies (monkey), one may have to go outside India (Gennova). There are very few BSL 3 facilities to do animal challenge studies.
  • Many convalescent plasma have very little neutralizing antibodies. Some of them have almost no antibodies. The amount is not the same as it is produced in other infections.
  • The amount of antibodies and the quality of antibodies which the vaccine will produce will be very critical.
  • NK cells are markers of innate immunity. If NK cells are okay, then it is better.
  • Mutations in the virus are happening rapidly now.
  • Monoclonal therapy: One single antibody may not work so a cocktail of three antibodies is preferred. Tocilizumab is actually IL-6 inhibitor.
  • Safety of the vaccine was a cause for concern because of the nature of the virus right from Day 0. It attacks all organs through immunological response (cytokine storm). This is why manufacturers are trying to take as little as possible of the virus. Age difference is critical; hence, three groups of populations are being studied in trials. Like influenza vaccine, this vaccine may need to be taken every year.
  • Cost of the vaccine will be a challenge.

























































 



Monday, March 16, 2020

Should we allow all below 40 to get the infection as a part of herd immunity plan


Should we allow all below 40 to get the infection as a part of herd immunity plan

‘herd immunity’ coronavirus plan is not scientific

Dr K K Aggarwal
President CMAAO, HCFI and Past national President IMA

The concept is based on the assumption that if 50 % of people ( all less than 40 years with least mortality) are infected one will be able to control the epidemic and also prevent a second wave next year.

But, vulnerable people should not be exposed to Covid-19 right now in the service of a hypothetical future.  

The hypothesis is to achieve “herd immunity” in order to manage the outbreak and prevent a catastrophic “second wave” next winter. The argument is generating immunity in younger people is a way of protecting the population as a whole.

We talk about vaccines generating herd immunity but, this is not a vaccine. This is an actual pandemic that will make a very large number of people sick, and some of them will die. Even though the mortality rate is likely quite low, a small fraction of a very large number is still a large number.

At the peak of the outbreak the numbers requiring critical care would be greater than the number of beds available. This is made worse by the fact that people who are badly ill tend to remain so for a long time, which increases the burden.

Second waves are real things, and we have seen them in flu pandemics. This is not a flu pandemic. Flu rules do not apply. But vulnerable people should not be exposed to a virus right now in the service of a hypothetical future.

It is increasingly clear that transmission can occur before symptoms develop. We know this is true from modelling and observational studies.

You should instead look to the example of South Korea, which, through a combination of intense surveillance and social distancing, appears to have gained some semblance of control over the virus. We can learn from South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan, all of which have so far done a good job mitigating the worst outcomes despite having reported cases early in the pandemic, and in the case of South Korea, suffering a substantial outbreak.

Policy should be directed at slowing the outbreak to a (more) manageable rate. What this looks like is strong social distancing. Anyone who can work from home, should. People who do not yet work from home should be encouraged to do so. Employers should guarantee sick pay, including for contacts of known cases, and do everything they can to discourage the practice of “presenteeism”. You should not shake hands. Not with anyone. You should wash your hands for 20 seconds several times a day and whenever you enter your home (or someone else’s home). Call a halt to large gatherings. Educate people about masks and how they should be reserved for the medical professionals who need them. All this and more should have started weeks ago.

Friday, February 28, 2020

UN agencies should have pressed for making a vaccine against SARS or MERS


UN agencies should have pressed for making a vaccine against SARS or MERS

Dr K K Aggarwal
President CMAAO, HCFI and Past National President IMA


Two years back World Health Organisation speculated a disease called disease X which was likely to be the next pandemic.

As per the speculation it will originate from animals, will be less fatal but more contagious than normal flu.

When all public experts knew that there was a possibility of a corona like virus becoming the next pandemic, efforts could have been made by the International UN agencies in making a vaccine for SARS in 2012 itself.

We know that flu vaccine changes strain every year but even the previous strain is effective in reducing the severity of the new strain of virus.

If Coronavirus vaccine was available today it could have made the COVID 19 disease milder.

The time is still not lost, and a vaccine should be made against corona viruses which should be able to take care of SARS, MERS and COVID 19 like illnesses.

SARS and MERS were hit and run viruses and never came back. Probably that made the agencies not bother about them.

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Dengue Vaccine : The Asian Concerns


Dengue Vaccine : The Asian Concerns

Dr KK Aggarwal
President CMAAO and HCFI


The Health Minister Dr Harsh Wardhan told the parliament that India is near ready for the dengue vaccine. Let us know the facts

Indian Scenario

1.      A live attenuated vaccine known as Dengvaxia, developed by Sanofi, was licensed in 2015. Following this, long-term follow-up of the Sanofi phase III efficacy trial participants has revealed potential safety concerns.

2.    This vaccine, which appears to predispose dengue-naïve recipients to an increased risk of hospitalization in the future, is recommended by the WHO only for adults with a history of prior dengue virus infection.

3.    India is poised now to test out two different dengue vaccine candidates in clinical trials in the near future, an LAV, TetraVax-DV, and a recombinant protein-based vaccine, DSV4.

4.    All current tetravalent LAV approaches are based on physical mixtures of empirically determined amounts of four monovalent vaccine viruses. Such mixtures manifest a tendency of viral interference and could simulate a monotypic infection. In such a situation, seronegative recipients may be potentially sensitized to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) later in life, upon natural DENV infection.

Scientific facts

1.     Infection with one DENV type provides long-term protection against reinfection with that same type, supporting the feasibility of an effective dengue vaccine.

2.      Also following infection with one type, there is short-lived immunity and cross-protection against disease caused by the other three DENV types.

3.     But in view of the association between previous exposure to DENV types and severe disease, and the recognition that all four DENV types are capable of causing severe disease, ideally any candidate vaccine should produce protective immunity against all four DENV types (tetravalent immunity).
Concerns

1.     Can India afford ruling out prior infection in every case before giving the vaccine?

2.     Will the tetravalent vaccine not produce ADE?

3.     Will the vaccine be cost effective?

4.     Given that the rate of clinically relevant third or fourth DENV infection is low, do we require tetravalent immunity?

5.     Since waning immunity might also increase the risk for severe disease in vaccine recipients the aim should be only to have long lived vaccine-induced protective immunity.

Malaysia Reports Vaccine Derived Polio VDPV1: Need to Switch to IPV and Stop OPV


Malaysia Reports Vaccine Derived Polio VDPV1: Need to Switch to IPV and Stop OPV

Dr KK Aggarwal
President CMAAO and HCFI

AP: KUALA LUMPUR - Malaysia began a vaccination campaign in a rural town on Borneo island after a 3-month-old boy was confirmed to have vaccine derived polio after 27 years.
               

The infant from Tuaran town in Sabah state tested positive for polio on Friday after he was hospitalized with fever and muscle weakness.

Poliovirus is classified as a circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 1 (VDPV1), which originates from a poliovirus that has been weakened by the orally-administered polio vaccine.

Vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPV) are Sabin (OPV) virus derivatives that circulate in settings of low population immunity (eg, with low immunization rates) and revert to neurovirulence with ongoing transmission.

The emergence of VDPV requires that use of all OPV vaccines must cease in order to achieve the goal of global poliomyelitis eradication.

Malaysia is the second Asian country to have reported a vaccine derived polio case after an outbreak in the Philippines in September.

Tests showed the baby's strain had genetic links to the vaccine derived polio virus detected in Philippines.

The strain originated from a weakened virus contained in oral polio vaccine that was excreted from the body through feces and believed to have spread in an unsanitary environment to those who haven't been immunized.
              

Concerns

1.     Since 2005, approximately 80 percent of cases occurring during cVDPV outbreaks have been caused by type 2 OPV virus. The recognition of cVDPVs dictates that all OPV use will need to cease to achieve full polio eradication.

2.     This case is VDPV1

3.     Each use of OPV2 response to a VDPV2 outbreak carries a risk of seeding new VDPV2 outbreaks. Therefore, timely control of VDPV2 outbreaks in the context of a growing cohort of children who do not have immunity to type 2 poliovirus is critical to the success of polio eradication.

4.     The present immunisation should be IPV and not OPV

More inputs are invited


Tuesday, January 9, 2018

H3N2 Aussies Flu, a near epidemic in Australia, UK and USA: H1N1 in Rajasthan India

H3N2 Aussies Flu, a near epidemic in Australia, UK and USA
H1N1 in Rajasthan India

The flu is rapidly spreading across the US, UK and Australia.

Not only did it start early, but it seemed to occur all over the country more or less simultaneously.
The predominant flu strain is H3N2. Vaccine effectiveness typically ranges from 40 to 60 percent in a good year. Preliminary estimates from last year show the vaccine was 40 percent effective in the U.S., similar to 2014-2015. But concerns have been raised about this year’s vaccine after an editorial published in the New England Journal of Medicine last Thursday said it was only 10 percent effective against H3N2 in Australia.

Additionally, years in which H3N2 is the predominant influenza strain tend to have higher death rates, with approximately 20,000 deaths in the 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 seasons when H3N2 predominated.

Good news is that H3N2 flu is quite susceptible to the available flu medications, like Tamiflu, also known as oseltamivir. Remember, it is most helpful if taken within 48 hours of the start of the flu. It can take up to two weeks for the body to build up defences against the virus.

It is especially important for pregnant women to get the vaccine. There is dual benefit for the pregnant woman to get vaccinated. Not only will she get protection, but she’ll also pass those antibodies along to her infant, which will protect them for the first 6 months of life when the infant is too young to get the vaccine. And the vaccine is safe for pregnant women and the fetus.

For those who contract the flu, it could make symptoms less severe. Next, make sure to wash hands carefully to limit the spread of the virus and try to avoid close contact with sick people.

People who get sick should also keep up with fluids — and seek medical attention if they start to feel worse or develop shortness of breath, worsening congestion or cough.

Public Health Concerns

1.       Trace the first case of H3N2 in India
2.       High risk people to consider vaccinations
3.       Do not allow any person suffering from flu to enter public places
4.       Give compulsory off to people suffering from flu

5.       Learn cough etiquettes and respiratory hygiene